Top h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets
Top h4831 vs h4831sc Secrets
Blog Article
Considering that there does not appear to be any "official" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can some of you supply a starting point with this mixture and points to think about when Operating this Load up?
H4831 will perform from the Swift but not actual effectively. You can never have the pressures you would like for consistency While using the .223. 760, or H414 will probably be far better but for a few cause I ain't the most significant lover of most ball powders.
Can they be interchanged without worries other then working with regular load techniques when switching from good deal to lot?
Which means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, find a setting up load when only one is shown for a selected cartridge.
In any case, I realized The 2 kilos of H4831SC utilized the exact same data, but I didn't know irrespective of whether there was anything various in between a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and one not so labeled. A call to Hodgdon verified they have been the truth is equivalent and the one big difference was The emblem about the label.
Given that there would not look like any "Formal" Load Data in existence for this Load, can many of you provide a starting point with h4831sc load data this mixture and items to think about when Functioning this Load up?
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but have a confined source of Varget, and also a whole lot a lot more obtainable H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Pretty much completely, since that's just what the rifles shoot the ideal.
Anyhow, I wished to give some 7828SC a try to lower some of the compression. What a error, I could not get this powder to shoot correctly or deliver the velocities I get with common 7828.
WA I'd advocate a slower burner that could give improved case density h4831 vs h4831sc like H1000 or IMR 7977, especially if you're loading heavies lengthy.
In addition it goes on to mention that as a result of fshorter grains, that load density may very h4831sc load data well be marginally higher.
I required a bit extra myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug to be protected for a while (and possess plenty of the exact same great deal of powder).
The "SC" means Shorter Slash. I haven't recognized a distinction between both powder dut I don't Believe I'd blend them.
I do know the H4831SC provides a much better load density But I believe I've more than enough home in my scenario for the conventional H4831.
I sawed 1 in fifty percent to discover how thick the jackets were being, and they had been very easily two times as thick for a fifty-grain hollow stage was. Ditto to the 64-grain Electricity Place, as these bullets are crafted for deer, not prairie pet dogs or woodchucks. You now know every thing I know about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I don't know anything whatsoever regarding the 223. I doubt that you're going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let's know the way it goes.